Introduction
The Delhi High Court is set to deliver its verdict today on the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) plea seeking a stay on the trial court’s order granting bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in connection with the alleged excise policy scam. This development marks a significant juncture in the ongoing legal proceedings that have captivated political and public attention alike.
Background of the Case
The controversy centers around the Delhi government’s excise policy introduced in 2021-22. Aimed at revitalizing the city’s liquor business, the policy replaced the sales-volume-based regime with a license fee structure, promising to modernize liquor stores. However, allegations of irregularities led to its scrapping and a subsequent investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The ED alleged that Kejriwal and his party, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), received kickbacks amounting to ₹100 crore, purportedly used for their election campaign in Goa.
On March 21, 2024, the ED arrested Kejriwal, branding him the ‘kingpin’ of the alleged scam. Despite spending weeks in jail, Kejriwal was temporarily release by the Supreme Court on May 10 to campaign for the Lok Sabha elections, only to return to custody on June 2 after further relief was deny.
Bail Granted and Contested
On June 20, Delhi’s Rouse Avenue Court granted regular bail to Kejriwal, highlighting the ED’s failure to produce direct evidence linking him to the crime’s proceeds. Moreover, This decision was swiftly challenge by the ED, which argue that the trial court’s order was “perverse” and based on irrelevant facts. Additional Solicitor General (ASG) S.V. Raju contend that the agency not get sufficient opportunity to present its case.
The very next day, the Delhi High Court imposed an interim stay on Kejriwal’s release, reserving its final verdict. This interim stay prevented Kejriwal from walking out of Tihar jail despite the bail granted by the lower court. Kejriwal then moved the Supreme Court, arguing that the High Court’s approach was “unusual” and an unwarranted curtailment of his personal liberty.
Supreme Court’s Stance
On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to pass any immediate order to overturn the Delhi High Court’s interim stay. A vacation Bench comprising Justices Manoj Misra and S V N Bhatti noted the peculiarity of the High Court reserving its order in a matter affecting personal liberty. “Orders are not reserved like this. It is a bit unusual,” remarked Justice Misra. Despite acknowledging the unusual nature of the High Court’s actions, the Supreme Court deferred hearing Kejriwal’s plea to June 26, indicating that it would await the High Court’s final decision.
Political Ramifications
This legal battle over Arvind Kejriwal’s bail has significant political ramifications. As the national convenor of AAP, Kejriwal’s detention and the ensuing legal tussle have galvanized his supporters and critics alike. Additionally, The situation is further complicate by the parallel issues face by other AAP leaders, such as Delhi Water Minister Atishi, who was recently hospitalize following a hunger strike protesting the water crisis in Delhi.
The Awaited Verdict
The Delhi High Court’s verdict, expected at 2:30 pm today, will be crucial in determining the immediate future of Arvind Kejriwal. The court’s decision will not only impact Kejriwal’s personal liberty but also potentially influence the political landscape, especially with upcoming elections. Moreover, The ED’s persistence in challenging the bail and the High Court’s interim stay underscore the contentious nature of this case.
As the High Court prepares to pronounce its verdict, all eyes are on the judicial proceedings, awaiting clarity on whether Arvind Kejriwal will remain behind bars or be released on bail. The outcome will set a significant precedent in the ongoing fight against alleged corruption in public office, shaping the narrative around political accountability and judicial fairness.
In conclusion, the Arvind Kejriwal bail case encapsulates a complex interplay of law, politics, and public interest, with today’s verdict poised to be a pivotal moment in this unfolding drama.
Also Read: Korean Air Emergency Landing: 17 Injured After 25,000ft Drop
Pinterest: Khabarey
